Sei whale:

Date/time (local)OccurrenceLatitudeLongitudeNotes
04/24/15 02:44:33Possibly detected41.2736-69.0814Single sw downsweep and single rw upcall look very good. Would like to say "detected" for rw based on the characteristics of the single upcall, but should stick to possibly detected (per protocol).
04/24/15 05:29:33Possibly detected41.2799-69.0483Great sw downsweep - isolated, great shape and very loud.
04/24/15 06:44:33Possibly detected41.2670-69.0301Two very nice sw downsweeps in panel 13 (1 classified, 1 unclassified).
04/24/15 07:29:33Possibly detected41.2378-69.0230Two possible sw downsweeps misclassified as call type 17.
04/24/15 08:29:33Possibly detected41.2413-69.0114sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 10.
04/24/15 09:44:33Possibly detected41.1985-69.0022sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 9. Single classified rw upcall is a spurious pitch track and not believable.
04/24/15 10:29:33Possibly detected41.1946-68.9951Single sw donwsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 2. Two classified rw upcalls in panel 5 are spurious.
04/24/15 11:40:15Possibly detected41.2045-68.9894Single sw downsweep - looks very good.
04/24/15 12:29:33Possibly detected41.2085-68.9842Single sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 12. Isolated, very loud, good shape, quite believable.
04/24/15 12:44:33Possibly detected41.2098-68.9818Single unclassified loud sw downsweep in panel 4.
04/24/15 15:29:33Detected41.2763-68.9501
04/24/15 16:29:33Detected41.2890-68.9314
04/24/15 20:29:33Detected41.2817-68.8672Very nice sw doublets.


Right whale:

Date/time (local)OccurrenceLatitudeLongitudeNotes
04/24/15 01:29:33Detected41.2486-69.0906Nice rw upcalls. Possibly even a moan in panel 8.
04/24/15 02:44:33Possibly detected41.2736-69.0814Single sw downsweep and single rw upcall look very good. Would like to say "detected" for rw based on the characteristics of the single upcall, but should stick to possibly detected (per protocol).
04/24/15 13:29:33Possibly detected41.2357-68.9759Classic rw upcall in panel 5, but only just the one.
04/24/15 19:29:33Possibly detected41.2825-68.8799Loud sw downsweep in panel 3? If it were classified, I would say "possibly detected", since its out of rhythm with the hw song. Many of the rw classified calls are in rhythm with the song and are very likely produced by a hw. However, the last upcall in panel 6 looks quite different and looks out of place for the song around it. Scoring rw as possibly detected based only on this last upcall.


Humpback whale:

Date/time (local)OccurrenceLatitudeLongitudeNotes
04/24/15 00:29:33Detected41.2464-69.1033Very suspicious of classified sw downsweeps - too entangled in hw calling sequence (in rhythm and same amplitude). Single classified rw upcall is not at all legit.
04/24/15 01:29:33Detected41.2486-69.0906Nice rw upcalls. Possibly even a moan in panel 8.
04/24/15 02:29:33Detected41.2734-69.0845
04/24/15 03:29:33Detected41.2743-69.0719
04/24/15 04:21:29Possibly detected41.2749-69.0621
04/24/15 04:59:33Detected41.2795-69.0547
04/24/15 08:29:33Detected41.2413-69.0114sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 10.
04/24/15 09:44:33Detected41.1985-69.0022sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 9. Single classified rw upcall is a spurious pitch track and not believable.
04/24/15 10:29:33Detected41.1946-68.9951Single sw donwsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 2. Two classified rw upcalls in panel 5 are spurious.
04/24/15 14:29:33Detected41.2583-68.9655
04/24/15 15:29:33Detected41.2763-68.9501
04/24/15 16:29:33Detected41.2890-68.9314
04/24/15 17:29:33Detected41.2911-68.9204
04/24/15 18:29:33Possibly detected41.2910-68.9074
04/24/15 19:29:33Detected41.2825-68.8799Loud sw downsweep in panel 3? If it were classified, I would say "possibly detected", since its out of rhythm with the hw song. Many of the rw classified calls are in rhythm with the song and are very likely produced by a hw. However, the last upcall in panel 6 looks quite different and looks out of place for the song around it. Scoring rw as possibly detected based only on this last upcall.
04/24/15 20:29:33Detected41.2817-68.8672Very nice sw doublets.
04/24/15 21:44:33Detected41.2604-68.8537
04/24/15 22:29:33Detected41.2595-68.8524
04/24/15 23:29:33Detected41.2670-68.8511




Notes:

Date/time (local)LatitudeLongitudeNotes
04/24/15 00:29:3341.2464-69.1033Very suspicious of classified sw downsweeps - too entangled in hw calling sequence (in rhythm and same amplitude). Single classified rw upcall is not at all legit.
04/24/15 01:29:3341.2486-69.0906Nice rw upcalls. Possibly even a moan in panel 8.
04/24/15 02:44:3341.2736-69.0814Single sw downsweep and single rw upcall look very good. Would like to say "detected" for rw based on the characteristics of the single upcall, but should stick to possibly detected (per protocol).
04/24/15 05:29:3341.2799-69.0483Great sw downsweep - isolated, great shape and very loud.
04/24/15 06:44:3341.2670-69.0301Two very nice sw downsweeps in panel 13 (1 classified, 1 unclassified).
04/24/15 07:29:3341.2378-69.0230Two possible sw downsweeps misclassified as call type 17.
04/24/15 08:29:3341.2413-69.0114sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 10.
04/24/15 09:44:3341.1985-69.0022sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 9. Single classified rw upcall is a spurious pitch track and not believable.
04/24/15 10:29:3341.1946-68.9951Single sw donwsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 2. Two classified rw upcalls in panel 5 are spurious.
04/24/15 11:40:1541.2045-68.9894Single sw downsweep - looks very good.
04/24/15 12:29:3341.2085-68.9842Single sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 12. Isolated, very loud, good shape, quite believable.
04/24/15 12:44:3341.2098-68.9818Single unclassified loud sw downsweep in panel 4.
04/24/15 13:29:3341.2357-68.9759Classic rw upcall in panel 5, but only just the one.
04/24/15 13:44:3341.2375-68.9731Very poor shape to single viewable classified rw upcall - scored as not detected.
04/24/15 19:29:3341.2825-68.8799Loud sw downsweep in panel 3? If it were classified, I would say "possibly detected", since its out of rhythm with the hw song. Many of the rw classified calls are in rhythm with the song and are very likely produced by a hw. However, the last upcall in panel 6 looks quite different and looks out of place for the song around it. Scoring rw as possibly detected based only on this last upcall.
04/24/15 20:29:3341.2817-68.8672Very nice sw doublets.


Back