Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
04/30/15 01:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
04/30/15 01:34:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
04/30/15 02:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: There are tons of FW pulses in this period and most have a 16s IPI,
but some break the pattern and have a longer IPI. The amplitudes of all the
pulses are also very inconsistent and there is some low freq noise that could
be causing these. I'm skeptical to the point of saying "Not Detected" based
on past meetings but this is arguable because there is are a lot of places
where the 16s IPI is consistent. |
04/30/15 02:34:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Technically the protocol says you need 3+ classified singlets for "Detected",
but given the SW presence in past tracking periods I'm confident enough with
the one classified singlet in this short tracking period to say "Detected". |
04/30/15 05:19:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: Two very nice SW-like downsweeps in panels 6 and 16 but
unclassified, made an exception with the protocol to say "Possibly". Since SW
presence has already been established for 4/30 a definite "Detected"/"Not
Detected" ruling is unnecessary. Some possible HW song in panel 15 but not
enough pattern or clarity to say "Possibly". Again, FW pulses show a fairly
consistent 15-16s IPI with a few that are out of pattern. But these pulses
have more consistent amplitudes than in previous tracking periods and there is
less low freq noise that could be creating false classifications. |
04/30/15 19:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
04/30/15 20:19:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Went against protocol here to say SWs are present. Faint downsweep in panel 1,
doublet in panel 5, and another doublet in panel 14 where one downsweep is
classified as HW. All others are unclassified but PTs are convincing and SWs
were detected in a recent previous tracking period. |
04/30/15 20:34:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Two nice long downsweeps in panels 2 and 3 but no pattern and no other signs of
HW. |
04/30/15 20:49:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
04/30/15 05:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: Two very nice SW-like downsweeps in panels 6 and 16 but
unclassified, made an exception with the protocol to say "Possibly". Since SW
presence has already been established for 4/30 a definite "Detected"/"Not
Detected" ruling is unnecessary. Some possible HW song in panel 15 but not
enough pattern or clarity to say "Possibly". Again, FW pulses show a fairly
consistent 15-16s IPI with a few that are out of pattern. But these pulses
have more consistent amplitudes than in previous tracking periods and there is
less low freq noise that could be creating false classifications. |
04/30/15 05:34:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Three FW pulses in pattern in panel 2. Multiple signs of possible HW, esp. in
panels 2, 4, and 6 but being conservative and sticking with a "Possibly"
classification. |
04/30/15 08:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: Two possible HW calls around 130 Hz in panel 11? Much more
consistent FW pulse train starting in panel 12 with no pulses that are out of
rhythm. |
04/30/15 08:34:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Train of three classified FW pulses in panel 1, not enough evidence to go to
"Detected". Some high freq noise in panels 7 and 8 but not enough pattern and
too many artifacts to suggest HW. |
Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
04/30/15 04:19:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Starting to see a pattern in panels 8 and 9 that look like possible HW song.
It's too faint and inconsistent to be positive, but also similar enough to
song patterns seen before to rule out HW presence entirely. |
04/30/15 05:34:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Three FW pulses in pattern in panel 2. Multiple signs of possible HW, esp. in
panels 2, 4, and 6 but being conservative and sticking with a "Possibly"
classification. |
04/30/15 06:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Finally some clear HW! The pattern seen in panels 7 and 8 are good indicators
that HWs were present in the previous tracking period as well. |
04/30/15 20:34:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Two nice long downsweeps in panels 2 and 3 but no pattern and no other signs of
HW. |
04/30/15 22:19:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Nice pattern of faint but probable HW downsweeps in panel 4. Needed more/longer
PTs to say "Detected". |
04/30/15 23:19:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Two nice long downsweeps in panels 6 and 11 but no pattern and too high freq to
be SW. |
Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
04/30/15 02:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: There are tons of FW pulses in this period and most have a 16s IPI,
but some break the pattern and have a longer IPI. The amplitudes of all the
pulses are also very inconsistent and there is some low freq noise that could
be causing these. I'm skeptical to the point of saying "Not Detected" based
on past meetings but this is arguable because there is are a lot of places
where the 16s IPI is consistent. |
04/30/15 02:34:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Technically the protocol says you need 3+ classified singlets for "Detected",
but given the SW presence in past tracking periods I'm confident enough with
the one classified singlet in this short tracking period to say "Detected". |
04/30/15 04:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Starting to see a pattern in panels 8 and 9 that look like possible HW song.
It's too faint and inconsistent to be positive, but also similar enough to
song patterns seen before to rule out HW presence entirely. |
04/30/15 05:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: Two very nice SW-like downsweeps in panels 6 and 16 but
unclassified, made an exception with the protocol to say "Possibly". Since SW
presence has already been established for 4/30 a definite "Detected"/"Not
Detected" ruling is unnecessary. Some possible HW song in panel 15 but not
enough pattern or clarity to say "Possibly". Again, FW pulses show a fairly
consistent 15-16s IPI with a few that are out of pattern. But these pulses
have more consistent amplitudes than in previous tracking periods and there is
less low freq noise that could be creating false classifications. |
04/30/15 05:34:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Three FW pulses in pattern in panel 2. Multiple signs of possible HW, esp. in
panels 2, 4, and 6 but being conservative and sticking with a "Possibly"
classification. |
04/30/15 06:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Finally some clear HW! The pattern seen in panels 7 and 8 are good indicators
that HWs were present in the previous tracking period as well. |
04/30/15 07:04:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Two higher amp PTs in panels 5 and 6 could be HW but there is no other
evidence. |
04/30/15 07:49:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: I am skeptical of these FW pulses. They start out nice, with a
fairly consistent 15s IPI but there are few that have IPIs closer to 18-19s
(i.e. first classified pulses in panels 5 and 7) and there is inconsistency in
the amplitudes. Then from panel 9 to the end of the tracking period they
start getting more random with varying IPI, amps, and a double pulse in panel
12. Staying with "Not Detected" until case can be discussed. |
04/30/15 08:04:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | A moan in panel 3? Classified FW pulses are too random to be convincing. |
04/30/15 08:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: Two possible HW calls around 130 Hz in panel 11? Much more
consistent FW pulse train starting in panel 12 with no pulses that are out of
rhythm. |
04/30/15 08:34:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Train of three classified FW pulses in panel 1, not enough evidence to go to
"Detected". Some high freq noise in panels 7 and 8 but not enough pattern and
too many artifacts to suggest HW. |
04/30/15 10:49:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Nice downsweep in panel 9 but it's classified as a HW so not enough for
"Possibly" for SW. |
04/30/15 16:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Longer, possibly biological PTs in panels 3, 5-7, 9, 10, 12... HW? |
04/30/15 17:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Two more longer PTs in panels 7 and 16, not enough tracks or pattern to assume a
HW is present. |
04/30/15 20:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Went against protocol here to say SWs are present. Faint downsweep in panel 1,
doublet in panel 5, and another doublet in panel 14 where one downsweep is
classified as HW. All others are unclassified but PTs are convincing and SWs
were detected in a recent previous tracking period. |
04/30/15 20:34:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Two nice long downsweeps in panels 2 and 3 but no pattern and no other signs of
HW. |
04/30/15 22:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Nice pattern of faint but probable HW downsweeps in panel 4. Needed more/longer
PTs to say "Detected". |
04/30/15 23:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Two nice long downsweeps in panels 6 and 11 but no pattern and too high freq to
be SW. |