| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/11/15 00:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Nice double FW pulse train here. |
| 06/11/15 07:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
| 06/11/15 22:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Nice double FW pulse train here. |
| 06/11/15 23:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/11/15 00:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Nice double FW pulse train here. |
| 06/11/15 19:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | If four FW pulses in panels 4 and 5 had more consistent IPIs then I would have been more inclined to say "Possibly", not convinced by this case. |
| 06/11/15 22:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Nice double FW pulse train here. |