| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 10/04/15 00:58:31 | 42.9539 | -65.3321 | Fin: 3 faint classified calls in p1-2, but pattern is not consistent enough for possible |
| 10/04/15 06:58:31 | 42.9867 | -65.3920 | Unknown LF tonals in p4. Check spectrogram. |
| 10/04/15 11:58:31 | 42.9968 | -65.4031 | Fin: 3 classified calls in p11 but not consistent enough pattern for possible |
| 10/04/15 12:58:31 | 42.9994 | -65.4368 | Fin: 7 classified calls in p6-7 with consistent ~8s IPIs. Faint and amid other noise but pattern
is consistent enough for me to be confident with detected. |
| 10/04/15 14:58:31 | 43.0114 | -65.4914 | Nice, loud fin example |
| 10/04/15 15:58:31 | 43.0165 | -65.4845 | Unknown LF tonals p6. Check spectrogram |
| 10/04/15 16:58:31 | 43.0199 | -65.5105 | Sei: shapely doublet with both downsweeps classified. Amid some noise, but no evidence of
humpbacks. |
| 10/04/15 17:13:31 | 43.0206 | -65.5084 | Sei: isolated, loud, and decently shaped doublet in p6, but neither downsweep are classified.
No evidence of humpbacks. Protocol dictates 1-2 classified singlets for "possible", so in the
interest of staying conservative I'll leave this as not detected. Check spectrogram. |
| 10/04/15 17:58:31 | 43.0234 | -65.5016 | Sei: very loud shapely isolated doublet in p8 that's not classified. Another doublet in p11 with
1 downsweep (the uglier one) classified. This satisfies protocol for "possible". |
| 10/04/15 18:58:31 | 43.0264 | -65.4910 | Fin: 3 classified calls in p3 but one is missing from sequence so it doesn't satisfy criteria for
possible. |
| 10/04/15 19:58:31 | 43.0297 | -65.4823 | Fin: 3 classified calls in p1-2 but calls are missing from pattern. Also amid other noise. |
| 10/04/15 20:58:31 | 43.0326 | -65.4492 | Fin: 6 calls in pattern with consistent IPIs in p9, 4 are classified. Evidence of an earlier pattern
in p8. A bit messy but loud. Good enough for detected. |