| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/15 02:44:33 | Possibly detected | 41.2736 | -69.0814 | Single sw downsweep and single rw upcall look very good. Would like to say "detected" for rw based on the characteristics of the single upcall, but should stick to possibly detected (per protocol). |
| 04/24/15 05:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.2799 | -69.0483 | Great sw downsweep - isolated, great shape and very loud. |
| 04/24/15 06:44:33 | Possibly detected | 41.2670 | -69.0301 | Two very nice sw downsweeps in panel 13 (1 classified, 1 unclassified). |
| 04/24/15 07:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.2378 | -69.0230 | Two possible sw downsweeps misclassified as call type 17. |
| 04/24/15 08:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.2413 | -69.0114 | sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 10. |
| 04/24/15 09:44:33 | Possibly detected | 41.1985 | -69.0022 | sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 9. Single classified rw upcall is a spurious pitch track and not believable. |
| 04/24/15 10:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.1946 | -68.9951 | Single sw donwsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 2. Two classified rw upcalls in panel 5 are spurious. |
| 04/24/15 11:40:15 | Possibly detected | 41.2045 | -68.9894 | Single sw downsweep - looks very good. |
| 04/24/15 12:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.2085 | -68.9842 | Single sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 12. Isolated, very loud, good shape, quite believable. |
| 04/24/15 12:44:33 | Possibly detected | 41.2098 | -68.9818 | Single unclassified loud sw downsweep in panel 4. |
| 04/24/15 15:29:33 | Detected | 41.2763 | -68.9501 | |
| 04/24/15 16:29:33 | Detected | 41.2890 | -68.9314 | |
| 04/24/15 20:29:33 | Detected | 41.2817 | -68.8672 | Very nice sw doublets. |
| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/15 01:29:33 | Detected | 41.2486 | -69.0906 | Nice rw upcalls. Possibly even a moan in panel 8. |
| 04/24/15 02:44:33 | Possibly detected | 41.2736 | -69.0814 | Single sw downsweep and single rw upcall look very good. Would like to say "detected" for rw based on the characteristics of the single upcall, but should stick to possibly detected (per protocol). |
| 04/24/15 13:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.2357 | -68.9759 | Classic rw upcall in panel 5, but only just the one. |
| 04/24/15 19:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.2825 | -68.8799 | Loud sw downsweep in panel 3? If it were classified, I would say "possibly detected", since its out of rhythm with the hw song. Many of the rw classified calls are in rhythm with the song and are very likely produced by a hw. However, the last upcall in panel 6 looks quite different and looks out of place for the song around it. Scoring rw as possibly detected based only on this last upcall. |
| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/15 00:29:33 | Detected | 41.2464 | -69.1033 | Very suspicious of classified sw downsweeps - too entangled in hw calling sequence (in rhythm and same amplitude). Single classified rw upcall is not at all legit. |
| 04/24/15 01:29:33 | Detected | 41.2486 | -69.0906 | Nice rw upcalls. Possibly even a moan in panel 8. |
| 04/24/15 02:29:33 | Detected | 41.2734 | -69.0845 | |
| 04/24/15 03:29:33 | Detected | 41.2743 | -69.0719 | |
| 04/24/15 04:21:29 | Possibly detected | 41.2749 | -69.0621 | |
| 04/24/15 04:59:33 | Detected | 41.2795 | -69.0547 | |
| 04/24/15 08:29:33 | Detected | 41.2413 | -69.0114 | sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 10. |
| 04/24/15 09:44:33 | Detected | 41.1985 | -69.0022 | sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 9. Single classified rw upcall is a spurious pitch track and not believable. |
| 04/24/15 10:29:33 | Detected | 41.1946 | -68.9951 | Single sw donwsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 2. Two classified rw upcalls in panel 5 are spurious. |
| 04/24/15 14:29:33 | Detected | 41.2583 | -68.9655 | |
| 04/24/15 15:29:33 | Detected | 41.2763 | -68.9501 | |
| 04/24/15 16:29:33 | Detected | 41.2890 | -68.9314 | |
| 04/24/15 17:29:33 | Detected | 41.2911 | -68.9204 | |
| 04/24/15 18:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.2910 | -68.9074 | |
| 04/24/15 19:29:33 | Detected | 41.2825 | -68.8799 | Loud sw downsweep in panel 3? If it were classified, I would say "possibly detected", since its out of rhythm with the hw song. Many of the rw classified calls are in rhythm with the song and are very likely produced by a hw. However, the last upcall in panel 6 looks quite different and looks out of place for the song around it. Scoring rw as possibly detected based only on this last upcall. |
| 04/24/15 20:29:33 | Detected | 41.2817 | -68.8672 | Very nice sw doublets. |
| 04/24/15 21:44:33 | Detected | 41.2604 | -68.8537 | |
| 04/24/15 22:29:33 | Detected | 41.2595 | -68.8524 | |
| 04/24/15 23:29:33 | Detected | 41.2670 | -68.8511 |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/15 00:29:33 | 41.2464 | -69.1033 | Very suspicious of classified sw downsweeps - too entangled in hw calling sequence (in rhythm and same amplitude). Single classified rw upcall is not at all legit. |
| 04/24/15 01:29:33 | 41.2486 | -69.0906 | Nice rw upcalls. Possibly even a moan in panel 8. |
| 04/24/15 02:44:33 | 41.2736 | -69.0814 | Single sw downsweep and single rw upcall look very good. Would like to say "detected" for rw based on the characteristics of the single upcall, but should stick to possibly detected (per protocol). |
| 04/24/15 05:29:33 | 41.2799 | -69.0483 | Great sw downsweep - isolated, great shape and very loud. |
| 04/24/15 06:44:33 | 41.2670 | -69.0301 | Two very nice sw downsweeps in panel 13 (1 classified, 1 unclassified). |
| 04/24/15 07:29:33 | 41.2378 | -69.0230 | Two possible sw downsweeps misclassified as call type 17. |
| 04/24/15 08:29:33 | 41.2413 | -69.0114 | sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 10. |
| 04/24/15 09:44:33 | 41.1985 | -69.0022 | sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 9. Single classified rw upcall is a spurious pitch track and not believable. |
| 04/24/15 10:29:33 | 41.1946 | -68.9951 | Single sw donwsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 2. Two classified rw upcalls in panel 5 are spurious. |
| 04/24/15 11:40:15 | 41.2045 | -68.9894 | Single sw downsweep - looks very good. |
| 04/24/15 12:29:33 | 41.2085 | -68.9842 | Single sw downsweep misclassified as call type 17 in panel 12. Isolated, very loud, good shape, quite believable. |
| 04/24/15 12:44:33 | 41.2098 | -68.9818 | Single unclassified loud sw downsweep in panel 4. |
| 04/24/15 13:29:33 | 41.2357 | -68.9759 | Classic rw upcall in panel 5, but only just the one. |
| 04/24/15 13:44:33 | 41.2375 | -68.9731 | Very poor shape to single viewable classified rw upcall - scored as not detected. |
| 04/24/15 19:29:33 | 41.2825 | -68.8799 | Loud sw downsweep in panel 3? If it were classified, I would say "possibly detected", since its out of rhythm with the hw song. Many of the rw classified calls are in rhythm with the song and are very likely produced by a hw. However, the last upcall in panel 6 looks quite different and looks out of place for the song around it. Scoring rw as possibly detected based only on this last upcall. |
| 04/24/15 20:29:33 | 41.2817 | -68.8672 | Very nice sw doublets. |