Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
05/11/15 00:44:33 | Detected | 41.6273 | -69.3174 | |
05/11/15 00:59:33 | Detected | 41.6284 | -69.3148 | |
05/11/15 01:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.6308 | -69.3092 | |
05/11/15 01:44:33 | Possibly detected | 41.6320 | -69.3064 | Possible SW doublet in panel 5 that was misclassified as HW. |
05/11/15 02:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.6355 | -69.2982 | |
05/11/15 03:29:33 | Detected | 41.6534 | -69.2950 | |
05/11/15 04:29:33 | Detected | 41.6569 | -69.2828 | |
05/11/15 05:29:33 | Detected | 41.6598 | -69.2717 | |
05/11/15 07:18:55 | Detected | 41.6659 | -69.2514 | SW downsweeps in panel 13 aren't as even as previously seen but are reasonably isolated from HW song, have nice shape and amp, and there is one that is classified as SW. |
05/11/15 13:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.6452 | -69.1798 | Two possible, but low quality PTs in panel 9 that could be unclassified SW. |
05/11/15 20:29:33 | Detected | 41.6699 | -69.1356 | |
05/11/15 22:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.6276 | -69.1083 | |
05/11/15 23:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.6209 | -69.0998 | Looks like some possible SW downsweeps in panel 4 but they aren't very clear there are no SW classifications, so it's unclear if these are SWs or random HW calls. |
Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
05/11/15 03:29:33 | Detected | 41.6534 | -69.2950 | |
05/11/15 04:29:33 | Detected | 41.6569 | -69.2828 | |
05/11/15 05:29:33 | Detected | 41.6598 | -69.2717 | |
05/11/15 05:44:33 | Detected | 41.6606 | -69.2689 | |
05/11/15 06:29:33 | Detected | 41.6634 | -69.2599 | |
05/11/15 07:18:55 | Detected | 41.6659 | -69.2514 | SW downsweeps in panel 13 aren't as even as previously seen but are reasonably isolated from HW song, have nice shape and amp, and there is one that is classified as SW. |
05/11/15 10:29:33 | Detected | 41.6285 | -69.1972 | |
05/11/15 13:44:33 | Detected | 41.6476 | -69.1793 | |
05/11/15 14:18:25 | Possibly detected | 41.6524 | -69.1784 | The PTs in this tracking period look very much like HW downsweeps but there are a lot of artifacts which led to some uncertainty. |
05/11/15 14:44:33 | Detected | 41.6759 | -69.1808 | |
05/11/15 15:29:33 | Detected | 41.6818 | -69.1767 | |
05/11/15 16:29:33 | Detected | 41.6822 | -69.1692 | |
05/11/15 17:29:33 | Detected | 41.6953 | -69.1631 | |
05/11/15 18:29:33 | Detected | 41.6874 | -69.1555 | |
05/11/15 19:29:33 | Detected | 41.6775 | -69.1428 | Five classified FW pulses in panel 6 but had no consistency in IPI and were all low amp, highly suspect they were caused by random noise. |
05/11/15 20:29:33 | Detected | 41.6699 | -69.1356 | |
05/11/15 21:29:33 | Detected | 41.6576 | -69.1265 | |
05/11/15 23:29:33 | Detected | 41.6209 | -69.0998 | Looks like some possible SW downsweeps in panel 4 but they aren't very clear there are no SW classifications, so it's unclear if these are SWs or random HW calls. |
Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
05/11/15 01:44:33 | 41.6320 | -69.3064 | Possible SW doublet in panel 5 that was misclassified as HW. |
05/11/15 04:44:33 | 41.6577 | -69.2800 | Too many artifacts here to provide good evidence for HW presence, disregarding presence in previous tracking periods. |
05/11/15 07:18:55 | 41.6659 | -69.2514 | SW downsweeps in panel 13 aren't as even as previously seen but are reasonably isolated from HW song, have nice shape and amp, and there is one that is classified as SW. |
05/11/15 08:29:33 | 41.6474 | -69.2286 | A lot of spurious PTs with some pattern but almost all are low frequency and could just be some recurring noise. |
05/11/15 09:37:21 | 41.6541 | -69.2196 | Some more biological looking PTs in panels 8 and 12, but need more evidence to suggest HW. |
05/11/15 13:29:33 | 41.6452 | -69.1798 | Two possible, but low quality PTs in panel 9 that could be unclassified SW. |
05/11/15 14:18:25 | 41.6524 | -69.1784 | The PTs in this tracking period look very much like HW downsweeps but there are a lot of artifacts which led to some uncertainty. |
05/11/15 19:29:33 | 41.6775 | -69.1428 | Five classified FW pulses in panel 6 but had no consistency in IPI and were all low amp, highly suspect they were caused by random noise. |
05/11/15 23:29:33 | 41.6209 | -69.0998 | Looks like some possible SW downsweeps in panel 4 but they aren't very clear there are no SW classifications, so it's unclear if these are SWs or random HW calls. |