| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 12/24/25 00:17:24 | Detected | 43.1310 | -70.0396 | suspect upcalls all through the data. Not sure if they fit into the song well. Seem
to be higher SNR than other calls in P1 & P2 |
| 12/24/25 01:16:28 | Possibly detected | 43.1275 | -70.0496 | Some of these Bp calls look very Mn-like or just very high RL forming harmonics. |
| 12/24/25 01:47:24 | Detected | 43.1265 | -70.0496 | Same as last note, but looks more convincing of Bp calls at high RL forming
harmonics. |
| 12/24/25 02:02:24 | Detected | 43.1252 | -70.0511 | |
| 12/24/25 02:17:24 | Possibly detected | 43.1239 | -70.0525 | |
| 12/24/25 03:02:24 | Detected | 43.1202 | -70.0569 | |
| 12/24/25 03:17:24 | Detected | 43.1189 | -70.0583 | Upcall w/ harmonics does not fit the Mn call structures or amplitudes. |
| 12/24/25 03:32:24 | Detected | 43.1177 | -70.0597 | |
| 12/24/25 08:47:24 | Detected | 43.0860 | -70.0780 | |
| 12/24/25 09:02:24 | Detected | 43.0863 | -70.0807 | |
| 12/24/25 09:17:24 | Detected | 43.0864 | -70.0825 | |
| 12/24/25 09:32:24 | Detected | 43.0867 | -70.0853 | |
| 12/24/25 10:17:24 | Detected | 43.0874 | -70.0938 | |
| 12/24/25 10:32:24 | Detected | 43.0876 | -70.0966 | |
| 12/24/25 10:41:03 | Detected | 43.0854 | -70.0986 | Suspect NARW upcalls on P5 |
| 12/24/25 11:17:24 | Detected | 43.0808 | -70.1036 | |
| 12/24/25 11:32:24 | Detected | 43.0808 | -70.1065 | NARW detection (P4) likely part of Mn song |
| 12/24/25 11:47:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0808 | -70.1095 | Highly likely fin whales, does not meet criteria for detected. |
| 12/24/25 12:17:24 | Detected | 43.0807 | -70.1153 | |
| 12/24/25 13:17:24 | Detected | 43.0806 | -70.1268 | |
| 12/24/25 14:17:24 | Detected | 43.0757 | -70.1351 | Suspect low SNR upcalls in P3-P5. Likely Mn calls, but needs additional review |
| 12/24/25 14:32:24 | Detected | 43.0755 | -70.1369 | Possible NARW upcalls in P1 & P14. in P14 the upcall coincides with a downsweeping
Mn call and is at significantly different SNR/amplitude values. Possibly multiple
Mn calls causing the overlap? |
| 12/24/25 15:17:24 | Detected | 43.0751 | -70.1423 | Still a bit unsure about the consistent overlapping detections of Mn & Bp.
Consideration needs to be made with raw acoustic data to determine if Bp calls are
misclassified Mn calls. |
| 12/24/25 15:32:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0749 | -70.1441 | Needs review (P1, one classified, one potential unclassified NARW call). Likely Mn
call. No direct call overlap and similar SNR/amplitude. |
| 12/24/25 16:17:24 | Detected | 43.0713 | -70.1484 | Upsweeps in P10 are suspect. Amplitude different than surrounding Mn calls, does
not fit current Mn song structure, and is relatively separate from other Mn calls
in time. Autodetected upcall in P11 likely lower harmonic of Mn call, but could use
additional review. |
| 12/24/25 16:32:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0714 | -70.1495 | Data limited, but review needed for possible calls in early panels. |
| 12/24/25 17:17:24 | Detected | 43.0719 | -70.1528 | Likely Mn calls, but needs additional review. |
| 12/24/25 17:32:24 | Detected | 43.0721 | -70.1539 | NARW calls highly likely part of Mn song. Additional review required for decision. |
| 12/24/25 18:07:29 | Detected | 43.0708 | -70.1568 | |
| 12/24/25 19:17:24 | Detected | 43.0718 | -70.1624 | Lots of activity. Needs additional review. |
| 12/24/25 20:17:24 | Detected | 43.0737 | -70.1689 | First half of P6 needs review for potential NARW upcalls/moans. likely Mn calls,
but concurrent upsweep/downsweep is a cause for concern. |
| 12/24/25 21:17:24 | Detected | 43.0743 | -70.1739 | |
| 12/24/25 23:32:24 | Detected | 43.0802 | -70.1905 | |
| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 12/24/25 00:17:24 | Possibly detected | 43.1310 | -70.0396 | suspect upcalls all through the data. Not sure if they fit into the song well. Seem
to be higher SNR than other calls in P1 & P2 |
| 12/24/25 03:17:24 | Possibly detected | 43.1189 | -70.0583 | Upcall w/ harmonics does not fit the Mn call structures or amplitudes. |
| 12/24/25 10:41:03 | Possibly detected | 43.0854 | -70.0986 | Suspect NARW upcalls on P5 |
| 12/24/25 14:17:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0757 | -70.1351 | Suspect low SNR upcalls in P3-P5. Likely Mn calls, but needs additional review |
| 12/24/25 14:32:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0755 | -70.1369 | Possible NARW upcalls in P1 & P14. in P14 the upcall coincides with a downsweeping
Mn call and is at significantly different SNR/amplitude values. Possibly multiple
Mn calls causing the overlap? |
| 12/24/25 15:32:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0749 | -70.1441 | Needs review (P1, one classified, one potential unclassified NARW call). Likely Mn
call. No direct call overlap and similar SNR/amplitude. |
| 12/24/25 16:17:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0713 | -70.1484 | Upsweeps in P10 are suspect. Amplitude different than surrounding Mn calls, does
not fit current Mn song structure, and is relatively separate from other Mn calls
in time. Autodetected upcall in P11 likely lower harmonic of Mn call, but could use
additional review. |
| 12/24/25 16:32:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0714 | -70.1495 | Data limited, but review needed for possible calls in early panels. |
| 12/24/25 17:17:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0719 | -70.1528 | Likely Mn calls, but needs additional review. |
| 12/24/25 17:32:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0721 | -70.1539 | NARW calls highly likely part of Mn song. Additional review required for decision. |
| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 12/24/25 00:17:24 | Detected | 43.1310 | -70.0396 | suspect upcalls all through the data. Not sure if they fit into the song well. Seem
to be higher SNR than other calls in P1 & P2 |
| 12/24/25 01:16:28 | Possibly detected | 43.1275 | -70.0496 | Some of these Bp calls look very Mn-like or just very high RL forming harmonics. |
| 12/24/25 01:47:24 | Possibly detected | 43.1265 | -70.0496 | Same as last note, but looks more convincing of Bp calls at high RL forming
harmonics. |
| 12/24/25 02:02:24 | Possibly detected | 43.1252 | -70.0511 | |
| 12/24/25 02:17:24 | Detected | 43.1239 | -70.0525 | |
| 12/24/25 02:32:24 | Detected | 43.1227 | -70.0540 | |
| 12/24/25 03:02:24 | Detected | 43.1202 | -70.0569 | |
| 12/24/25 03:17:24 | Detected | 43.1189 | -70.0583 | Upcall w/ harmonics does not fit the Mn call structures or amplitudes. |
| 12/24/25 03:32:24 | Detected | 43.1177 | -70.0597 | |
| 12/24/25 05:47:24 | Detected | 43.1023 | -70.0619 | |
| 12/24/25 06:02:24 | Detected | 43.1010 | -70.0623 | |
| 12/24/25 06:32:24 | Detected | 43.0962 | -70.0622 | |
| 12/24/25 06:47:24 | Detected | 43.0955 | -70.0635 | |
| 12/24/25 07:17:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0935 | -70.0672 | |
| 12/24/25 07:32:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0925 | -70.0691 | |
| 12/24/25 07:47:24 | Detected | 43.0916 | -70.0707 | |
| 12/24/25 08:17:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0889 | -70.0751 | Not sure what to make of this here. |
| 12/24/25 08:47:24 | Detected | 43.0860 | -70.0780 | |
| 12/24/25 09:02:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0863 | -70.0807 | |
| 12/24/25 09:17:24 | Detected | 43.0864 | -70.0825 | |
| 12/24/25 09:32:24 | Detected | 43.0867 | -70.0853 | |
| 12/24/25 10:17:24 | Detected | 43.0874 | -70.0938 | |
| 12/24/25 10:32:24 | Detected | 43.0876 | -70.0966 | |
| 12/24/25 10:41:03 | Possibly detected | 43.0854 | -70.0986 | Suspect NARW upcalls on P5 |
| 12/24/25 11:17:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0808 | -70.1036 | |
| 12/24/25 11:32:24 | Detected | 43.0808 | -70.1065 | NARW detection (P4) likely part of Mn song |
| 12/24/25 12:17:24 | Detected | 43.0807 | -70.1153 | |
| 12/24/25 13:17:24 | Detected | 43.0806 | -70.1268 | |
| 12/24/25 13:47:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0760 | -70.1315 | Possible Mn on P1 or noise. |
| 12/24/25 14:02:24 | Detected | 43.0759 | -70.1333 | Check Bp dets to see if they fit criteria for detected |
| 12/24/25 14:17:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0757 | -70.1351 | Suspect low SNR upcalls in P3-P5. Likely Mn calls, but needs additional review |
| 12/24/25 14:32:24 | Detected | 43.0755 | -70.1369 | Possible NARW upcalls in P1 & P14. in P14 the upcall coincides with a downsweeping
Mn call and is at significantly different SNR/amplitude values. Possibly multiple
Mn calls causing the overlap? |
| 12/24/25 15:17:24 | Detected | 43.0751 | -70.1423 | Still a bit unsure about the consistent overlapping detections of Mn & Bp.
Consideration needs to be made with raw acoustic data to determine if Bp calls are
misclassified Mn calls. |
| 12/24/25 15:32:24 | Detected | 43.0749 | -70.1441 | Needs review (P1, one classified, one potential unclassified NARW call). Likely Mn
call. No direct call overlap and similar SNR/amplitude. |
| 12/24/25 16:17:24 | Detected | 43.0713 | -70.1484 | Upsweeps in P10 are suspect. Amplitude different than surrounding Mn calls, does
not fit current Mn song structure, and is relatively separate from other Mn calls
in time. Autodetected upcall in P11 likely lower harmonic of Mn call, but could use
additional review. |
| 12/24/25 16:32:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0714 | -70.1495 | Data limited, but review needed for possible calls in early panels. |
| 12/24/25 17:17:24 | Detected | 43.0719 | -70.1528 | Likely Mn calls, but needs additional review. |
| 12/24/25 17:32:24 | Detected | 43.0721 | -70.1539 | NARW calls highly likely part of Mn song. Additional review required for decision. |
| 12/24/25 18:07:29 | Detected | 43.0708 | -70.1568 | |
| 12/24/25 18:32:24 | Detected | 43.0704 | -70.1575 | |
| 12/24/25 18:47:24 | Detected | 43.0709 | -70.1591 | Lots of activity. Needs additional review |
| 12/24/25 19:17:24 | Detected | 43.0718 | -70.1624 | Lots of activity. Needs additional review. |
| 12/24/25 20:17:24 | Detected | 43.0737 | -70.1689 | First half of P6 needs review for potential NARW upcalls/moans. likely Mn calls,
but concurrent upsweep/downsweep is a cause for concern. |
| 12/24/25 21:17:24 | Detected | 43.0743 | -70.1739 | |
| 12/24/25 22:17:24 | Detected | 43.0771 | -70.1826 | |
| 12/24/25 23:32:24 | Detected | 43.0802 | -70.1905 | |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 12/24/25 00:17:24 | 43.1310 | -70.0396 | suspect upcalls all through the data. Not sure if they fit into the song well. Seem
to be higher SNR than other calls in P1 & P2 |
| 12/24/25 01:16:28 | 43.1275 | -70.0496 | Some of these Bp calls look very Mn-like or just very high RL forming harmonics. |
| 12/24/25 01:47:24 | 43.1265 | -70.0496 | Same as last note, but looks more convincing of Bp calls at high RL forming
harmonics. |
| 12/24/25 03:17:24 | 43.1189 | -70.0583 | Upcall w/ harmonics does not fit the Mn call structures or amplitudes. |
| 12/24/25 04:02:24 | 43.1135 | -70.0562 | Likely noise and not Mn. |
| 12/24/25 04:47:24 | 43.1087 | -70.0587 | Likely artifacts on P8 |
| 12/24/25 08:17:24 | 43.0889 | -70.0751 | Not sure what to make of this here. |
| 12/24/25 10:41:03 | 43.0854 | -70.0986 | Suspect NARW upcalls on P5 |
| 12/24/25 11:32:24 | 43.0808 | -70.1065 | NARW detection (P4) likely part of Mn song |
| 12/24/25 11:47:24 | 43.0808 | -70.1095 | Highly likely fin whales, does not meet criteria for detected. |
| 12/24/25 13:20:33 | 43.0768 | -70.1302 | Likely Mn in P2, but not enough information for possibly detected. |
| 12/24/25 13:47:24 | 43.0760 | -70.1315 | Possible Mn on P1 or noise. |
| 12/24/25 14:02:24 | 43.0759 | -70.1333 | Check Bp dets to see if they fit criteria for detected |
| 12/24/25 14:17:24 | 43.0757 | -70.1351 | Suspect low SNR upcalls in P3-P5. Likely Mn calls, but needs additional review |
| 12/24/25 14:32:24 | 43.0755 | -70.1369 | Possible NARW upcalls in P1 & P14. in P14 the upcall coincides with a downsweeping
Mn call and is at significantly different SNR/amplitude values. Possibly multiple
Mn calls causing the overlap? |
| 12/24/25 15:17:24 | 43.0751 | -70.1423 | Still a bit unsure about the consistent overlapping detections of Mn & Bp.
Consideration needs to be made with raw acoustic data to determine if Bp calls are
misclassified Mn calls. |
| 12/24/25 15:32:24 | 43.0749 | -70.1441 | Needs review (P1, one classified, one potential unclassified NARW call). Likely Mn
call. No direct call overlap and similar SNR/amplitude. |
| 12/24/25 16:17:24 | 43.0713 | -70.1484 | Upsweeps in P10 are suspect. Amplitude different than surrounding Mn calls, does
not fit current Mn song structure, and is relatively separate from other Mn calls
in time. Autodetected upcall in P11 likely lower harmonic of Mn call, but could use
additional review. |
| 12/24/25 16:32:24 | 43.0714 | -70.1495 | Data limited, but review needed for possible calls in early panels. |
| 12/24/25 17:17:24 | 43.0719 | -70.1528 | Likely Mn calls, but needs additional review. |
| 12/24/25 17:32:24 | 43.0721 | -70.1539 | NARW calls highly likely part of Mn song. Additional review required for decision. |
| 12/24/25 18:47:24 | 43.0709 | -70.1591 | Lots of activity. Needs additional review |
| 12/24/25 19:17:24 | 43.0718 | -70.1624 | Lots of activity. Needs additional review. |
| 12/24/25 20:17:24 | 43.0737 | -70.1689 | First half of P6 needs review for potential NARW upcalls/moans. likely Mn calls,
but concurrent upsweep/downsweep is a cause for concern. |