| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 02/27/26 00:17:24 | Detected | 42.9624 | -70.2658 | Criteria met for fin in P10 |
| 02/27/26 00:47:24 | Detected | 42.9628 | -70.2601 | Criteria met for fin in P9. |
| 02/27/26 01:17:24 | Detected | 42.9633 | -70.2545 | Criteria met for fin in P14 |
| 02/27/26 02:02:24 | Detected | 42.9629 | -70.2502 | Criteria met for fin in P8 |
| 02/27/26 02:17:24 | Detected | 42.9634 | -70.2479 | Criteria met for fin in P11-12 |
| 02/27/26 02:32:24 | Detected | 42.9639 | -70.2456 | Criteria met for fin in P14-15 |
| 02/27/26 02:47:24 | Detected | 42.9644 | -70.2434 | Criteria met for fin in P1 with 3/4 of classified pulses in black box and only one
in gray box so marking as detected. |
| 02/27/26 03:17:24 | Detected | 42.9654 | -70.2388 | Humpback in P5 looks like background noise so marking as not detected. |
| 02/27/26 04:17:24 | Detected | 42.9653 | -70.2330 | NARW detections in P3 and P7-8. The structure of the upsweeps in P7-8 are more
convincing, but with the similar amplitude to non-bio background noise and the
proximity to that, I’m not convinced these are NARW, but with the potential baleen
whale present based on P5 and the structure of upsweeps I am marking this as
possibly detected. |
| 02/27/26 05:32:24 | Detected | 42.9649 | -70.2232 | Criteria met for fin in P13 |
| 02/27/26 05:47:24 | Detected | 42.9648 | -70.2213 | Criteria met for fin in P2. Data limited for NARW |
| 02/27/26 06:32:24 | Detected | 42.9631 | -70.2185 | Criteria met for fin P11 |
| 02/27/26 06:47:24 | Detected | 42.9628 | -70.2160 | Criteria met for fin in P1-2 |
| 02/27/26 07:17:24 | Detected | 42.9622 | -70.2110 | Marking fin as possible detected based on P8. There is a lot of LF background
noise mixed in with fin whale pulses throughout so I would not mark this as
detected. |
| 02/27/26 08:47:24 | Possibly detected | 42.9605 | -70.1975 | Marking fin as possibly detected based on P10-12 |
| 02/27/26 09:02:24 | Detected | 42.9603 | -70.1943 | Sei detection in P8 looks like a misclassification by the detector, marking as not
detected. Criteria met for fin in P1-2 |
| 02/27/26 09:32:24 | Detected | 42.9599 | -70.1878 | Criteria met for fin in P8 |
| 02/27/26 10:17:24 | Detected | 42.9594 | -70.1782 | Criteria met for fin in P3. Humpback in P10 looks non-bio, looks more like an
artifact and with the context being primarily background noise, marking as not
detected. |
| 02/27/26 11:17:24 | Detected | 42.9595 | -70.1671 | Criteria met in P3 for fin. NARW in P6 has a higher starting frequency, good
structure but also a faint/low amplitude that is similar to non-bio background
noise throughout the summary. Marking as not detected for now, I could also see
possibly detected. |
| 02/27/26 11:32:24 | Possibly detected | 42.9600 | -70.1635 | Marking fin as possibly detected with three consecutive classified pulses in P7
but there is inconsistent INI between two pulses but pulses are strong so marking
as possibly detected. P12 does have a convincing upsweep with a good structure but
only one unclassified so it does not meet possibly detected for NARW. There is
also background noise as context and a tail at the top of the upsweep with
changing amplitudes so marking as not detected. |
| 02/27/26 11:47:24 | Detected | 42.9605 | -70.1599 | Criteria met for fin in P2-3 |
| 02/27/26 12:17:24 | Detected | 42.9616 | -70.1526 | Criteria met for fin in P11 |
| 02/27/26 12:32:24 | Detected | 42.9621 | -70.1490 | Criteria met for fin in P1-2 with ~12 INI |
| 02/27/26 13:32:24 | Detected | 42.9653 | -70.1394 | Criteria met for fin in P8 |
| 02/27/26 13:47:24 | Detected | 42.9664 | -70.1364 | Criteria met for fin in P1. NARW in P7 looks like a misclassification, structure
does not look like an upcall, looks more like non-bio background noise so marking
as not detected. |
| 02/27/26 14:17:24 | Possibly detected | 42.9686 | -70.1305 | Marking fin as possibly detected primarily based on P3 although there are also
strong pulses in P1. However, there is a lot of background noise and only 3
consecutive classified pulses. There are other strong pulses in P3 however there
is also background noise surrounding multiple of these pulses so leaving as
possibly detected. |
| 02/27/26 15:17:24 | Detected | 42.9731 | -70.1187 | Criteria met for fin in P4. NARW in P6 looks like non-bio artifact, structure does
not look like upsweep and it is the same amplitude as surrounding background noise
so marking as not detected. |
| 02/27/26 16:17:24 | Detected | 42.9774 | -70.1121 | Criteria met for fin in P4 |
| 02/27/26 17:17:24 | Possibly detected | 42.9805 | -70.1042 | Marking fin as possibly detected based on P1-2, only 3 classified pulses in a row.
There are several pulses from P1-4 but there is also a lot of LF background noise
so I am cautiously marking this as possibly detected. |
| 02/27/26 17:32:24 | Detected | 42.9813 | -70.1023 | P12 has 4 very strong unclassified pulses with accurate INI, there are also strong
pulses in P15, some are classified and some are unclassified so I am breaking
protocol given the strong context and marking as detected for fin. |
| 02/27/26 17:47:24 | Detected | 42.9821 | -70.1003 | P1-4 has several strong pulses, some unclassified and some classified, with these
combined there is accurate INI and given this context breaking protocol to mark as
detected makes sense. |
| 02/27/26 18:32:24 | Detected | 42.9842 | -70.0962 | Criteria met for fin in P6-7 |
| 02/27/26 18:47:24 | Detected | 42.9842 | -70.0942 | Criteria met for fin in P10-11 |
| 02/27/26 19:17:24 | Detected | 42.9843 | -70.0901 | Criteria met for fin in P3 |
| 02/27/26 20:17:24 | Detected | 42.9844 | -70.0820 | Criteria met for fin in P2 |
| 02/27/26 21:17:24 | Detected | 42.9837 | -70.0711 | |
| 02/27/26 21:32:24 | Detected | 42.9830 | -70.0678 | |
| 02/27/26 22:17:24 | Detected | 42.9809 | -70.0579 | |
| 02/27/26 22:32:24 | Possibly detected | 42.9802 | -70.0547 | |
| 02/27/26 23:17:24 | Detected | 42.9774 | -70.0439 | |
| 02/27/26 23:32:24 | Detected | 42.9758 | -70.0396 | |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 02/27/26 00:17:24 | 42.9624 | -70.2658 | Criteria met for fin in P10 |
| 02/27/26 00:47:24 | 42.9628 | -70.2601 | Criteria met for fin in P9. |
| 02/27/26 01:02:24 | 42.9631 | -70.2573 | Data limited for fin |
| 02/27/26 01:17:24 | 42.9633 | -70.2545 | Criteria met for fin in P14 |
| 02/27/26 01:47:24 | 42.9624 | -70.2524 | Data limited for fin |
| 02/27/26 02:02:24 | 42.9629 | -70.2502 | Criteria met for fin in P8 |
| 02/27/26 02:17:24 | 42.9634 | -70.2479 | Criteria met for fin in P11-12 |
| 02/27/26 02:32:24 | 42.9639 | -70.2456 | Criteria met for fin in P14-15 |
| 02/27/26 02:47:24 | 42.9644 | -70.2434 | Criteria met for fin in P1 with 3/4 of classified pulses in black box and only one
in gray box so marking as detected. |
| 02/27/26 03:17:24 | 42.9654 | -70.2388 | Humpback in P5 looks like background noise so marking as not detected. |
| 02/27/26 04:17:24 | 42.9653 | -70.2330 | NARW detections in P3 and P7-8. The structure of the upsweeps in P7-8 are more
convincing, but with the similar amplitude to non-bio background noise and the
proximity to that, I’m not convinced these are NARW, but with the potential baleen
whale present based on P5 and the structure of upsweeps I am marking this as
possibly detected. |
| 02/27/26 05:32:24 | 42.9649 | -70.2232 | Criteria met for fin in P13 |
| 02/27/26 05:47:24 | 42.9648 | -70.2213 | Criteria met for fin in P2. Data limited for NARW |
| 02/27/26 06:32:24 | 42.9631 | -70.2185 | Criteria met for fin P11 |
| 02/27/26 06:47:24 | 42.9628 | -70.2160 | Criteria met for fin in P1-2 |
| 02/27/26 07:02:24 | 42.9625 | -70.2135 | NARW in P12 fits into background noise so marking as not detected. |
| 02/27/26 07:17:24 | 42.9622 | -70.2110 | Marking fin as possible detected based on P8. There is a lot of LF background
noise mixed in with fin whale pulses throughout so I would not mark this as
detected. |
| 02/27/26 07:47:24 | 42.9616 | -70.2061 | Data limited for fin |
| 02/27/26 08:47:24 | 42.9605 | -70.1975 | Marking fin as possibly detected based on P10-12 |
| 02/27/26 09:02:24 | 42.9603 | -70.1943 | Sei detection in P8 looks like a misclassification by the detector, marking as not
detected. Criteria met for fin in P1-2 |
| 02/27/26 09:32:24 | 42.9599 | -70.1878 | Criteria met for fin in P8 |
| 02/27/26 10:02:24 | 42.9596 | -70.1814 | Data limited for fin |
| 02/27/26 10:17:24 | 42.9594 | -70.1782 | Criteria met for fin in P3. Humpback in P10 looks non-bio, looks more like an
artifact and with the context being primarily background noise, marking as not
detected. |
| 02/27/26 10:32:24 | 42.9591 | -70.1755 | Classified humpback in P14 looks more similar to sei whale downsweep. It looks a
little steeper with a flat tail that could be an artifact and it is similar
amplitude to non-bio background noise but it does look similar to an example of
possible sei in the protocol so marking as possibly detected. |
| 02/27/26 11:17:24 | 42.9595 | -70.1671 | Criteria met in P3 for fin. NARW in P6 has a higher starting frequency, good
structure but also a faint/low amplitude that is similar to non-bio background
noise throughout the summary. Marking as not detected for now, I could also see
possibly detected. |
| 02/27/26 11:32:24 | 42.9600 | -70.1635 | Marking fin as possibly detected with three consecutive classified pulses in P7
but there is inconsistent INI between two pulses but pulses are strong so marking
as possibly detected. P12 does have a convincing upsweep with a good structure but
only one unclassified so it does not meet possibly detected for NARW. There is
also background noise as context and a tail at the top of the upsweep with
changing amplitudes so marking as not detected. |
| 02/27/26 11:47:24 | 42.9605 | -70.1599 | Criteria met for fin in P2-3 |
| 02/27/26 12:17:24 | 42.9616 | -70.1526 | Criteria met for fin in P11 |
| 02/27/26 12:32:24 | 42.9621 | -70.1490 | Criteria met for fin in P1-2 with ~12 INI |
| 02/27/26 13:32:24 | 42.9653 | -70.1394 | Criteria met for fin in P8 |
| 02/27/26 13:47:24 | 42.9664 | -70.1364 | Criteria met for fin in P1. NARW in P7 looks like a misclassification, structure
does not look like an upcall, looks more like non-bio background noise so marking
as not detected. |
| 02/27/26 14:17:24 | 42.9686 | -70.1305 | Marking fin as possibly detected primarily based on P3 although there are also
strong pulses in P1. However, there is a lot of background noise and only 3
consecutive classified pulses. There are other strong pulses in P3 however there
is also background noise surrounding multiple of these pulses so leaving as
possibly detected. |
| 02/27/26 14:32:24 | 42.9698 | -70.1276 | Data limited for fin |
| 02/27/26 15:17:24 | 42.9731 | -70.1187 | Criteria met for fin in P4. NARW in P6 looks like non-bio artifact, structure does
not look like upsweep and it is the same amplitude as surrounding background noise
so marking as not detected. |
| 02/27/26 16:17:24 | 42.9774 | -70.1121 | Criteria met for fin in P4 |
| 02/27/26 16:32:24 | 42.9782 | -70.1101 | Data limited for NARW and fin |
| 02/27/26 17:17:24 | 42.9805 | -70.1042 | Marking fin as possibly detected based on P1-2, only 3 classified pulses in a row.
There are several pulses from P1-4 but there is also a lot of LF background noise
so I am cautiously marking this as possibly detected. |
| 02/27/26 17:32:24 | 42.9813 | -70.1023 | P12 has 4 very strong unclassified pulses with accurate INI, there are also strong
pulses in P15, some are classified and some are unclassified so I am breaking
protocol given the strong context and marking as detected for fin. |
| 02/27/26 17:47:24 | 42.9821 | -70.1003 | P1-4 has several strong pulses, some unclassified and some classified, with these
combined there is accurate INI and given this context breaking protocol to mark as
detected makes sense. |
| 02/27/26 18:32:24 | 42.9842 | -70.0962 | Criteria met for fin in P6-7 |
| 02/27/26 18:47:24 | 42.9842 | -70.0942 | Criteria met for fin in P10-11 |
| 02/27/26 19:17:24 | 42.9843 | -70.0901 | Criteria met for fin in P3 |
| 02/27/26 20:17:24 | 42.9844 | -70.0820 | Criteria met for fin in P2 |