| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 03/08/26 00:17:24 | Detected | 43.0251 | -70.1626 | Criteria met for fin in P5 |
| 03/08/26 00:32:24 | Detected | 43.0271 | -70.1631 | Criteria met for fin in P1-2 |
| 03/08/26 01:17:24 | Detected | 43.0324 | -70.1612 | Criteria met for for fin in P3-4. The two detected NARW in P1 and one NARW in P13
all fit into background noise I have been seeing a lot of recently. Same amplitude
and the structure of the calls are not convincing so marking as not detected. |
| 03/08/26 02:17:24 | Detected | 43.0399 | -70.1582 | Criteria met for fin in P6. |
| 03/08/26 02:32:24 | Detected | 43.0417 | -70.1575 | Criteria met for fin in P14 |
| 03/08/26 04:17:24 | Detected | 43.0514 | -70.1534 | P7 has good example of 4 strong pulses with accurate ~15 INI. Only 2 are
classified but there are numerous strong unclassified pulses throughout summary,
so breaking protocol and marking as detected. |
| 03/08/26 05:17:24 | Detected | 43.0574 | -70.1508 | Good example of criteria met for fin in P10. |
| 03/08/26 05:28:39 | Detected | 43.0578 | -70.1504 | Marking fin as possibly detected, only three pulses, they are strong pulses but
only ~10 INI and no other pulses throughout summary so leaving as possibly
detected. |
| 03/08/26 07:17:24 | Detected | 43.0649 | -70.1607 | Criteria met for fin in P10-11 |
| 03/08/26 07:32:24 | Possibly detected | 43.0661 | -70.1625 | Marking fin as possibly detected based on P1-2. Being cautious because of all the
LF non-bio background noise. There are only 3 consecutive pulses with accurate INI
with background noise in between pulse trains so that's why I am being cautious. |
| 03/08/26 09:32:24 | Detected | 43.0777 | -70.1779 | Criteria met for fin in P2. |
| 03/08/26 12:17:24 | Detected | 43.0944 | -70.2040 | Criteria met for fin in P11 |
| 03/08/26 12:32:24 | Detected | 43.0959 | -70.2065 | Criteria met for fin in P6-7 |
| 03/08/26 20:47:24 | Possibly detected | 43.1220 | -70.2568 | possible fin p10 with ~13-15 sec IPI (middle, unclassified pulse is very short and
questionable but marking as possibly just in case) |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 03/08/26 00:17:24 | 43.0251 | -70.1626 | Criteria met for fin in P5 |
| 03/08/26 00:32:24 | 43.0271 | -70.1631 | Criteria met for fin in P1-2 |
| 03/08/26 01:17:24 | 43.0324 | -70.1612 | Criteria met for for fin in P3-4. The two detected NARW in P1 and one NARW in P13
all fit into background noise I have been seeing a lot of recently. Same amplitude
and the structure of the calls are not convincing so marking as not detected. |
| 03/08/26 02:17:24 | 43.0399 | -70.1582 | Criteria met for fin in P6. |
| 03/08/26 02:32:24 | 43.0417 | -70.1575 | Criteria met for fin in P14 |
| 03/08/26 02:47:24 | 43.0436 | -70.1567 | Data limited for fin and NARW |
| 03/08/26 04:17:24 | 43.0514 | -70.1534 | P7 has good example of 4 strong pulses with accurate ~15 INI. Only 2 are
classified but there are numerous strong unclassified pulses throughout summary,
so breaking protocol and marking as detected. |
| 03/08/26 05:17:24 | 43.0574 | -70.1508 | Good example of criteria met for fin in P10. |
| 03/08/26 05:28:39 | 43.0578 | -70.1504 | Marking fin as possibly detected, only three pulses, they are strong pulses but
only ~10 INI and no other pulses throughout summary so leaving as possibly
detected. |
| 03/08/26 06:02:24 | 43.0593 | -70.1526 | Data limited for fin |
| 03/08/26 06:32:24 | 43.0610 | -70.1553 | Marking fin as not detected, some sporadic pulses but not very strong and there is
a lot of LF non-bio noise. |
| 03/08/26 07:17:24 | 43.0649 | -70.1607 | Criteria met for fin in P10-11 |
| 03/08/26 07:32:24 | 43.0661 | -70.1625 | Marking fin as possibly detected based on P1-2. Being cautious because of all the
LF non-bio background noise. There are only 3 consecutive pulses with accurate INI
with background noise in between pulse trains so that's why I am being cautious. |
| 03/08/26 09:32:24 | 43.0777 | -70.1779 | Criteria met for fin in P2. |
| 03/08/26 10:47:24 | 43.0847 | -70.1877 | Criteria not met for fin and data limited for sei |
| 03/08/26 12:02:24 | 43.0928 | -70.2013 | Data limited for fin |
| 03/08/26 12:17:24 | 43.0944 | -70.2040 | Criteria met for fin in P11 |
| 03/08/26 12:32:24 | 43.0959 | -70.2065 | Criteria met for fin in P6-7 |
| 03/08/26 12:38:43 | 43.0966 | -70.2062 | Data limited for fin |
| 03/08/26 14:32:24 | 43.1043 | -70.2241 | Criteria not met for fin. NARW in P9 fits in well with background noise, same
amplitude and there has been lots of LF non-bio noise so it fits in with what I
have been seeing. Marking as not detected. |
| 03/08/26 15:47:24 | 43.1083 | -70.2326 | Data limited for fin whale |
| 03/08/26 16:17:24 | 43.1097 | -70.2353 | Good example of criteria met for fin in P3 |
| 03/08/26 16:32:24 | 43.1104 | -70.2366 | Criteria not met for fin |
| 03/08/26 18:32:24 | 43.1154 | -70.2463 | P4 has a very interesting downsweeping calls. I wonder if this is humpback? It
could be background noise I suppose but to me this looks biological. I believe the
structure is too steep to be sei and the frequency is too high. Interesting to see
what Julianne thinks. |
| 03/08/26 19:47:24 | 43.1179 | -70.2505 | NARW in P15 looks like a misclassification from the detector. Criteria not met for
fin. |
| 03/08/26 20:47:24 | 43.1220 | -70.2568 | possible fin p10 with ~13-15 sec IPI (middle, unclassified pulse is very short and
questionable but marking as possibly just in case) |
| 03/08/26 21:02:24 | 43.1232 | -70.2584 | classified humpback p3 appears to be background noise |