| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 03/30/26 00:02:24 | Detected | 42.8930 | -69.9712 | Bp detection criteria met in P9-P11 & P12-P13. |
| 03/30/26 00:17:24 | Detected | 42.8922 | -69.9727 | Bp detected throughout. Classified Mn call in P2 looks like artifact/non
biological noise, as does the calls around in P1 + P2 there for leaving not
detected. |
| 03/30/26 01:02:24 | Detected | 42.8898 | -69.9770 | Bp detection criteria met in P1 prior to data limit being reached. |
| 03/30/26 01:47:24 | Possibly detected | 42.8873 | -69.9814 | Bp met possibly criteria in P4-5 & P11, with INI ~ 16 seconds. Classified sei
whale call in P14 doesn't look like anything so leaving not detected. |
| 03/30/26 03:02:24 | Detected | 42.8844 | -69.9858 | There are a lot of artifacts around making me skeptical of unclassified frequency
modulated call in P4, so leaving Mn as not detected. Bp pulses in P4-P5 just meet
detected criteria with INI ~16 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 05:17:24 | Detected | 42.8830 | -70.0022 | A lot of non-biological noise around but Bp detection criteria met in P9-P10. |
| 03/30/26 08:17:24 | Possibly detected | 42.8859 | -70.0336 | Another very noisy page, aside from Bp pulses nothing stands out as biological.
Bp pulses in P11 meet possibly detected criteria, INI ~ 16 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 10:02:24 | Detected | 42.8862 | -70.0471 | Bp detection criteria best met in P8-P11 with INI ~ 17 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 10:17:24 | Detected | 42.8859 | -70.0485 | Bp detection criteria met in P1-4, INI ~ 16 seconds, likely multiple individuals. |
| 03/30/26 10:32:24 | Detected | 42.8855 | -70.0498 | Bp detection criteria met in P10-P11, INI ~ 16 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 11:47:24 | Possibly detected | 42.8838 | -70.0566 | Line of undetected likely Bp pulses in P3-P4 that have INI ~ 16 seconds. For
this reason, putting possibly detected despite only 1 being classified. Data
limited for Mn. |
| 03/30/26 12:47:24 | Detected | 42.8828 | -70.0562 | Many unclassified loud fin whale pulses in P4-P6, have consistent INI of ~16
seconds, for this reason going against protocol and marking as detected. |
| 03/30/26 13:17:24 | Possibly detected | 42.8822 | -70.0573 | Theres a lot of loud unclassified pulses around but only meets possibly detected
criteria in P2-P3 with a mix of unclassified/classified pulses with INI ~16
seconds. |
| 03/30/26 14:17:24 | Detected | 42.8810 | -70.0595 | Bp met detection criteria in P14-P14, INI ~ 16 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 15:02:24 | Detected | 42.8807 | -70.0601 | Bp met detection criteria throughout with INI~ 16 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 15:32:24 | Possibly detected | 42.8808 | -70.0639 | Bp met possibly detected criteria in P6 |
| 03/30/26 16:17:24 | Detected | 42.8809 | -70.0695 | Bp met detection criteria in P3-P4, INI ~ 16 seconds |
| 03/30/26 17:32:24 | Detected | 42.8836 | -70.0775 | Classified NARW call in P12 is just very faint/jagged and looks more like
artifact so not detected. Bp met detection criteria in P14-15, with INI ~ 16
seconds. Classified Mn down sweeps in P15 look like sei whale doublets but not
classified as such. Theres is also another potential unclassified downsweep in
P13. As pitch tracks classified as 17 can be considered sei in the absence of Mn
activity, going with detected for sei whale. |
| 03/30/26 19:16:55 | Detected | 42.8895 | -70.0982 | Criteria met for fin in P1-2. Downsweeps in P3 and P7 that are classified as
humpback look like sei whale doublets. There is also another unclassified doublet
in P10, all have high amplitude and match examples in protocol well (***downsweeps
in doublets are 3.5 secs apart as defined by Baumgartner et al. 2008) and no
humpback present so I am marking as detected. |
| 03/30/26 19:47:24 | Detected | 42.8918 | -70.1022 | Good example of criteria met for fin in P9-10. Classified humpback in P7 looks
like Sei whale doublet, strong amplitude, matches examples in protocol well,
(***downsweeps in doublets are 3.5 secs apart as defined by Baumgartner et al.
2008) and no humpback present so marking as detected. |
| 03/30/26 20:17:24 | Detected | 42.8927 | -70.1084 | Criteria met for fin in P12-13 |
| 03/30/26 20:32:24 | Detected | 42.8932 | -70.1115 | Criteria met for fin in P11. |
| 03/30/26 21:17:24 | Detected | 42.8946 | -70.1209 | Criteria met for fin in P5 with ~15 INI. NARW in P14 fits in well with
surrounding background noise, same amplitude and the structure looks more like an
artifact connecting two sounds so marking as not detected. |
| 03/30/26 21:32:24 | Detected | 42.8950 | -70.1233 | Criteria met for fin in P2. |
| 03/30/26 22:17:24 | Possibly detected | 42.8933 | -70.1245 | Marking fin as possibly detected primarily based on P11, P12-13 and 15 does have a
couple of classified pulses and there is one possible unclassified pulse in P11
that could be fin but it's not convincing enough to break protocol and mark as
detected. NARW in P6 looks like background noise, fits in well, same amplitude and
the structure does not look like upsweep so marking as not detected. |
| 03/30/26 23:32:24 | Possibly detected | 42.8878 | -70.1302 | Marking fin as possibly detected based on P5 |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 03/30/26 00:02:24 | 42.8930 | -69.9712 | Bp detection criteria met in P9-P11 & P12-P13. |
| 03/30/26 00:17:24 | 42.8922 | -69.9727 | Bp detected throughout. Classified Mn call in P2 looks like artifact/non
biological noise, as does the calls around in P1 + P2 there for leaving not
detected. |
| 03/30/26 01:02:24 | 42.8898 | -69.9770 | Bp detection criteria met in P1 prior to data limit being reached. |
| 03/30/26 01:47:24 | 42.8873 | -69.9814 | Bp met possibly criteria in P4-5 & P11, with INI ~ 16 seconds. Classified sei
whale call in P14 doesn't look like anything so leaving not detected. |
| 03/30/26 02:02:24 | 42.8865 | -69.9824 | a lot of artifacts in this 15 minute period. |
| 03/30/26 03:02:24 | 42.8844 | -69.9858 | There are a lot of artifacts around making me skeptical of unclassified frequency
modulated call in P4, so leaving Mn as not detected. Bp pulses in P4-P5 just meet
detected criteria with INI ~16 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 03:17:24 | 42.8844 | -69.9877 | very noisy page, aside from classified Bp pulses none of it looks biological. |
| 03/30/26 03:32:24 | 42.8844 | -69.9896 | Another very noisy page, nothing stands out as biological |
| 03/30/26 03:47:24 | 42.8844 | -69.9914 | Another very noisy page, nothing stands out as biological |
| 03/30/26 04:17:24 | 42.8845 | -69.9952 | Another very noisy page, nothing stands out as biological |
| 03/30/26 04:32:24 | 42.8843 | -69.9966 | Another very noisy page, nothing stands out as biological |
| 03/30/26 05:17:24 | 42.8830 | -70.0022 | A lot of non-biological noise around but Bp detection criteria met in P9-P10. |
| 03/30/26 06:32:24 | 42.8852 | -70.0153 | Another very noisy page, nothing stands out as biological |
| 03/30/26 06:47:24 | 42.8857 | -70.0179 | Another very noisy page, nothing stands out as biological |
| 03/30/26 07:32:24 | 42.8860 | -70.0254 | Another very noisy page, nothing stands out as biological. Classified NARW call
in P9 looks non biological, so leaving as not detected. |
| 03/30/26 07:47:24 | 42.8859 | -70.0281 | Another very noisy page, nothing stands out as biological- looks like artifacts. |
| 03/30/26 08:17:24 | 42.8859 | -70.0336 | Another very noisy page, aside from Bp pulses nothing stands out as biological.
Bp pulses in P11 meet possibly detected criteria, INI ~ 16 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 08:32:24 | 42.8859 | -70.0363 | Another very noisy page, nothing stands out as biological |
| 03/30/26 10:02:24 | 42.8862 | -70.0471 | Bp detection criteria best met in P8-P11 with INI ~ 17 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 10:17:24 | 42.8859 | -70.0485 | Bp detection criteria met in P1-4, INI ~ 16 seconds, likely multiple individuals. |
| 03/30/26 10:32:24 | 42.8855 | -70.0498 | Bp detection criteria met in P10-P11, INI ~ 16 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 11:47:24 | 42.8838 | -70.0566 | Line of undetected likely Bp pulses in P3-P4 that have INI ~ 16 seconds. For
this reason, putting possibly detected despite only 1 being classified. Data
limited for Mn. |
| 03/30/26 12:47:24 | 42.8828 | -70.0562 | Many unclassified loud fin whale pulses in P4-P6, have consistent INI of ~16
seconds, for this reason going against protocol and marking as detected. |
| 03/30/26 13:17:24 | 42.8822 | -70.0573 | Theres a lot of loud unclassified pulses around but only meets possibly detected
criteria in P2-P3 with a mix of unclassified/classified pulses with INI ~16
seconds. |
| 03/30/26 14:17:24 | 42.8810 | -70.0595 | Bp met detection criteria in P14-P14, INI ~ 16 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 15:02:24 | 42.8807 | -70.0601 | Bp met detection criteria throughout with INI~ 16 seconds. |
| 03/30/26 15:32:24 | 42.8808 | -70.0639 | Bp met possibly detected criteria in P6 |
| 03/30/26 16:17:24 | 42.8809 | -70.0695 | Bp met detection criteria in P3-P4, INI ~ 16 seconds |
| 03/30/26 17:32:24 | 42.8836 | -70.0775 | Classified NARW call in P12 is just very faint/jagged and looks more like
artifact so not detected. Bp met detection criteria in P14-15, with INI ~ 16
seconds. Classified Mn down sweeps in P15 look like sei whale doublets but not
classified as such. Theres is also another potential unclassified downsweep in
P13. As pitch tracks classified as 17 can be considered sei in the absence of Mn
activity, going with detected for sei whale. |
| 03/30/26 19:16:55 | 42.8895 | -70.0982 | Criteria met for fin in P1-2. Downsweeps in P3 and P7 that are classified as
humpback look like sei whale doublets. There is also another unclassified doublet
in P10, all have high amplitude and match examples in protocol well (***downsweeps
in doublets are 3.5 secs apart as defined by Baumgartner et al. 2008) and no
humpback present so I am marking as detected. |
| 03/30/26 19:47:24 | 42.8918 | -70.1022 | Good example of criteria met for fin in P9-10. Classified humpback in P7 looks
like Sei whale doublet, strong amplitude, matches examples in protocol well,
(***downsweeps in doublets are 3.5 secs apart as defined by Baumgartner et al.
2008) and no humpback present so marking as detected. |
| 03/30/26 20:17:24 | 42.8927 | -70.1084 | Criteria met for fin in P12-13 |
| 03/30/26 20:32:24 | 42.8932 | -70.1115 | Criteria met for fin in P11. |
| 03/30/26 20:47:24 | 42.8936 | -70.1147 | Strong HF downsweep in P2, not much other context (maybe some in P1 and P10 but
not convincing) so marking humpback as possibly detected. |
| 03/30/26 21:17:24 | 42.8946 | -70.1209 | Criteria met for fin in P5 with ~15 INI. NARW in P14 fits in well with
surrounding background noise, same amplitude and the structure looks more like an
artifact connecting two sounds so marking as not detected. |
| 03/30/26 21:32:24 | 42.8950 | -70.1233 | Criteria met for fin in P2. |
| 03/30/26 21:37:49 | 42.8955 | -70.1222 | Data limited for fin |
| 03/30/26 22:17:24 | 42.8933 | -70.1245 | Marking fin as possibly detected primarily based on P11, P12-13 and 15 does have a
couple of classified pulses and there is one possible unclassified pulse in P11
that could be fin but it's not convincing enough to break protocol and mark as
detected. NARW in P6 looks like background noise, fits in well, same amplitude and
the structure does not look like upsweep so marking as not detected. |
| 03/30/26 22:32:24 | 42.8922 | -70.1256 | Data limited for fin |
| 03/30/26 23:32:24 | 42.8878 | -70.1302 | Marking fin as possibly detected based on P5 |