| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 08/05/15 00:32:57 | Detected | 43.0311 | -65.1161 | |
| 08/05/15 01:10:46 | Detected | 43.0380 | -65.1289 | Great fw double and single pulse sequences. |
| 08/05/15 03:32:57 | Detected | 43.0290 | -65.1273 | 9-10 s IPI for fw pulse train. |
| 08/05/15 03:46:23 | Detected | 43.0339 | -65.1157 | Scoring detected based on 4 calls sequence in panel 8 (2nd call not classified). Several double pulses, and
long LF tones in panels 4-6 may be double pulses stitched together into a single pitch track. |
| 08/05/15 05:47:57 | Detected | 43.0296 | -65.1042 | Sequence in panel 6 seems legit. |
| 08/05/15 07:32:57 | Possibly detected | 43.0256 | -65.0544 | Sequence in panel 15 looks okay, but 3rd call is not classified (and looks too high in frequency). Since
some uncertainty, scoring as possibly detected. |
| 08/05/15 08:32:57 | Possibly detected | 43.0174 | -65.0549 | Sequence of 3 fw calls in panel 4. |
| 08/05/15 09:32:57 | Possibly detected | 43.0208 | -65.0176 | 4-call fw sequence in panel 9 looks legit (3rd call in sequence is unclassified). Still some uncertainty, so
scoring as possibly detected. |
| 08/05/15 09:47:57 | Detected | 43.0188 | -65.0182 | Double fw pulses in sequence in panel 7. |
| 08/05/15 10:02:57 | Detected | 43.0164 | -65.0191 | LF tones in panels 15-16 are almost surely double fw pulses. |
| 08/05/15 10:17:57 | Detected | 43.0149 | -65.0196 | Change from single to double fw pulses? |
| 08/05/15 10:32:57 | Detected | 43.0122 | -65.0206 | Nice double pulse sequence. |
| 08/05/15 10:47:57 | Possibly detected | 43.0107 | -65.0209 | |
| 08/05/15 11:17:57 | Detected | 43.0062 | -65.0225 | |
| 08/05/15 12:02:57 | Detected | 43.0167 | -65.0199 | fw sequence in panel 7 is convincing. |
| 08/05/15 13:32:57 | Possibly detected | 43.0034 | -65.0241 | |
| 08/05/15 13:53:03 | Possibly detected | 43.0013 | -65.0248 | |
| 08/05/15 15:02:57 | Detected | 43.0085 | -65.0269 | Lovely long fw pulse sequence (the way it should be!!!). |
| 08/05/15 16:02:57 | Possibly detected | 42.9998 | -65.0297 | fw possibly detected based on 3-call sequence right at the end of the summary period. Another hw-like
downsweep in panel 14. |
| 08/05/15 16:17:51 | Detected | 42.9981 | -65.0300 | |
| 08/05/15 17:02:57 | Detected | 43.0035 | -65.0023 | |
| 08/05/15 17:17:57 | Detected | 43.0015 | -65.0035 | fw detected based on last sequence of calls before pitch track transmission turns off. |
| 08/05/15 21:01:58 | Possibly detected | 42.9719 | -64.9757 | fw possibly detected based on sequence in panel 13. Not very happy with several fw classified calls in very
fast repetition in panels 9-10. Suspicious. |
| 08/05/15 22:02:57 | Detected | 42.9596 | -64.9497 | fw sequence in panels 9-10 has IPI of ~15 seconds. Seems legit, although IPI seems too long for this time
of year. Scoring as detected, as this all conforms to the rules. |
| 08/05/15 22:17:57 | Detected | 42.9581 | -64.9522 | fw sequence in panel 3 seems okay, although there is a mix of single and double pulses. |
| 08/05/15 23:17:57 | Possibly detected | 42.9523 | -64.9615 | fw sequence in panel 5 may consist of double pulses, although the IPI isn't exactly constant. Still, it seems
possible that this is a real fw sequence, so scoring this as possibly detected. |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 08/05/15 01:10:46 | 43.0380 | -65.1289 | Great fw double and single pulse sequences. |
| 08/05/15 03:32:57 | 43.0290 | -65.1273 | 9-10 s IPI for fw pulse train. |
| 08/05/15 03:46:23 | 43.0339 | -65.1157 | Scoring detected based on 4 calls sequence in panel 8 (2nd call not classified). Several double pulses, and
long LF tones in panels 4-6 may be double pulses stitched together into a single pitch track. |
| 08/05/15 04:17:57 | 43.0379 | -65.1082 | Some long LF tones in panels 15-16. |
| 08/05/15 04:32:57 | 43.0368 | -65.1076 | Several classified fw calls, but none in a sequence of 3 or more. |
| 08/05/15 05:02:57 | 43.0340 | -65.1063 | More fw calls, including some double pulses, but none in sequence of 3 or more. |
| 08/05/15 05:17:57 | 43.0329 | -65.1057 | Several fw calls, none in sequence. |
| 08/05/15 05:47:57 | 43.0296 | -65.1042 | Sequence in panel 6 seems legit. |
| 08/05/15 07:32:57 | 43.0256 | -65.0544 | Sequence in panel 15 looks okay, but 3rd call is not classified (and looks too high in frequency). Since
some uncertainty, scoring as possibly detected. |
| 08/05/15 08:17:57 | 43.0197 | -65.0547 | Many double pulses, but none in sequence. |
| 08/05/15 08:32:57 | 43.0174 | -65.0549 | Sequence of 3 fw calls in panel 4. |
| 08/05/15 09:32:57 | 43.0208 | -65.0176 | 4-call fw sequence in panel 9 looks legit (3rd call in sequence is unclassified). Still some uncertainty, so
scoring as possibly detected. |
| 08/05/15 09:47:57 | 43.0188 | -65.0182 | Double fw pulses in sequence in panel 7. |
| 08/05/15 10:02:57 | 43.0164 | -65.0191 | LF tones in panels 15-16 are almost surely double fw pulses. |
| 08/05/15 10:17:57 | 43.0149 | -65.0196 | Change from single to double fw pulses? |
| 08/05/15 10:32:57 | 43.0122 | -65.0206 | Nice double pulse sequence. |
| 08/05/15 12:02:57 | 43.0167 | -65.0199 | fw sequence in panel 7 is convincing. |
| 08/05/15 15:02:57 | 43.0085 | -65.0269 | Lovely long fw pulse sequence (the way it should be!!!). |
| 08/05/15 15:17:57 | 43.0068 | -65.0274 | Many fw calls, but none in convincing sequences. Downsweep in panel 7 is very hw-like, but there's only
the one call. |
| 08/05/15 16:02:57 | 42.9998 | -65.0297 | fw possibly detected based on 3-call sequence right at the end of the summary period. Another hw-like
downsweep in panel 14. |
| 08/05/15 17:17:57 | 43.0015 | -65.0035 | fw detected based on last sequence of calls before pitch track transmission turns off. |
| 08/05/15 19:17:57 | 42.9836 | -64.9633 | Isolated LF downsweep in panel 9 seems like sw (classified as 17). |
| 08/05/15 20:02:57 | 42.9784 | -64.9688 | Classified rw upcall in panel 4 is quiet, but good shape and classified. Not exactly isolated, but of different
amplitude than surrounding sounds. A possible unclassified upcall in panel 3, but not at all sure. Are LF
sounds in panels 4-5 hw? |
| 08/05/15 21:01:58 | 42.9719 | -64.9757 | fw possibly detected based on sequence in panel 13. Not very happy with several fw classified calls in very
fast repetition in panels 9-10. Suspicious. |
| 08/05/15 22:02:57 | 42.9596 | -64.9497 | fw sequence in panels 9-10 has IPI of ~15 seconds. Seems legit, although IPI seems too long for this time
of year. Scoring as detected, as this all conforms to the rules. |
| 08/05/15 22:17:57 | 42.9581 | -64.9522 | fw sequence in panel 3 seems okay, although there is a mix of single and double pulses. |
| 08/05/15 23:17:57 | 42.9523 | -64.9615 | fw sequence in panel 5 may consist of double pulses, although the IPI isn't exactly constant. Still, it seems
possible that this is a real fw sequence, so scoring this as possibly detected. |